Live vs Asynchronous Communication: Which is Best?

The business landscape and workplace has changed drastically in recent years. Professional environments are growing more “digitized”, as companies look for ways to reduce operating costs, align distributed (hybrid and remote teams), and boost productivity.

In this changing landscape, the way employees communicate, both with each other, and with customers, has evolved. We now have endless options for live (synchronous) communication and asynchronous interactions. The challenge is in figuring out which communication method makes the most sense in different scenarios. 

Here’s your guide to live vs asynchronous communication. 

What is Live (Synchronous) Communication?

Let’s start by defining synchronous communication, or “live” communication. This refers to any form of communication that happens in real-time. Face-to-face discussions, phone calls, video conferences, and so on are all forms of synchronous communication. 

For most people, synchronous communication is the most natural way to share information. We’re used to talking to people in-person, or over the phone when we want an immediate response. 

There are many situations where “live” communication makes a lot of sense. For instance, when you’re onboarding a new customer, being available to answer their questions in real time delivers a better level of service. When you’re building rapport with a new prospect, a live conversation allows for a more human level of “natural back-and-forth”. 

Used correctly, live communication can lead to:

• Deeper, more meaningful interactions: Live communication gives people the opportunity to interact and share information in real-time. You can ask questions, share opinions, brainstorm, and build ideas collaboratively, while forming emotional connections. 
• Faster results: With synchronous communication, there’s no need to wait around for an issue to be resolved or for someone to answer a question. This makes live communication ideal for issues that need immediate attention. 
• New opportunities: The natural back-and-forth in synchronous communication means people can often collaborate more effectively, discover new ideas and innovate at speed. This leads to new opportunities for business growth.

Of course, there are downsides to synchronous communication too. For instance, a live conversation can draw a person’s attention away from another more important task in the workplace. It can also be difficult to arrange a time when people can communicate freely, particularly if two members of a discussion are located in different time zones.

Best Practices for Synchronous Communication

In instances where synchronous communication makes sense for your business, it’s important to ensure you’re taking the right approach to empowering and aligning teams. Some of the best ways to improve “live communication” include:

• Keep the number of participants small: Too many team members communicating in real-time can lead to disruption, interruptions, and confusion. The last thing you want is for all of your employees to talk over each other. 
• Record the conversation: Recording conversations over the phone, or recording video meetings means you can go back and double-check facts later on. It also ensures you can share important information with people who weren’t available to attend the discussion.
• Have an agenda: Plan the purpose of the discussion, the intended outcomes, and the topics to cover in advance. This will help to ensure conversations stay on track. Make sure you define action items things to follow up on at the end of the meeting too. 

It also helps to ensure people have a variety of different ways to communicate in real-time, from phone conversations to video conferencing, and in-person interactions. Use complementary tools like calendaring software to streamline the scheduling process.

What is Asynchronous Communication?

Where synchronous communication refers to live, real-time interactions, asynchronous communication covers all interactions that encounter “delays” between messages. In other words, it’s when you communicate with someone without expecting an immediate response. 

Common methods for asynchronous communication include emails, or direct mail, sending messages through collaboration tools or project management apps, text messages, video recordings, and asynchronous meetings. 

When an immediate response isn’t necessary, asynchronous communication can be extremely useful. It can be a great way to deliver training and guidance to employees in a high-performance team, without disrupting the flow of work, or just keep employees updated about workplace changes. 

Used correctly, asynchronous communication benefits from:

• Flexibility: With asynchronous communication, people have the freedom to respond to messages and information at their own pace. There’s no need for a person to stop what they’re doing to interact with someone else. 
• Engagement: Asynchronous communication is frequently used in the sales cycle to keep leads and prospects engaged. It allows professionals to follow up regularly with customers, and build trust, loyalty, and thought leadership. 
• Versatility: With asynchronous communications, you don’t have to worry as much about time zones getting in the way of important discussions. You can continue to interact with people regardless of where they are.

On the other hand, asynchronous communication can be frustrating. There’s no sense of immediacy, so people are left waiting for a response for longer. Plus, because you’re not interacting with someone in “real-time” it’s much harder to build an emotional, human connection.

Best Practices for Asynchronous Communication

Asynchronous communication is becoming increasingly common in a world where employees are working in distributed environments and geographies. It’s also crucial to the sales cycle for many companies, allowing businesses to nurture relationships over time.

However, once again, you need a strategy to boost the outcomes of your communication efforts:

• Use different communication methods: Email might be the most common solution for asynchronous communication but it’s not the only option. Consider experimenting with social media, text, and other tools, based on your contact’s preferences. 
• Get straight to the point: When communicating with someone asynchronously, it’s important to get to the point clearly and quickly in your message. Any confusion or complexity will just cause more delays in the discussion. 
• Set deadlines: Actively encourage a response by a specific time. For instance, if you’re sending a message to a customer to ask them to arrange a meeting, suggest a date for a call and ask your customer to let you know if they’re happy with it as quickly as possible.

Additionally, it’s worth looking for opportunities to use asynchronous communication as often as possible. A message or email can be an excellent replacement for a meeting or complex conversation when you want to avoid disrupting your team member.